MedTech AI Skills & MCP Index
A curated index of publicly available AI agent skills and MCP servers relevant to MedTech startups — devices, diagnostics, and digital health / SaMD.
Reviewed June 2026 · maintained quarterly
- Useful to most MedTech founders
- Digital health / SaMD
- Diagnostics / genomics only
- Bench-research (largely not founder-facing)
On this page
How to read this
- Skill
- — a Markdown file (plus optional scripts) that teaches an AI agent how to do a task. Procedural know-how loaded into context on demand.
- MCP server
- — a running service that gives an agent a live connection to an external system (a database, API, or pipeline) via standardised tool calls.
- Cross-tool by default. Most skills here follow the open Agent Skills standard, so they work across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and others — not just Claude.
- An index, not a code dump. Links go to upstream with the licence noted; nothing is re-hosted. Install from source.
- Access. Skills need a paid Claude plan (Pro/Max/Team/Enterprise) inside Claude; MCP servers need a compatible client.
- A blunt caveat. The life-science skill ecosystem is large but skews heavily toward academic bench research (RNA-seq, variant calling, ChIP-seq, population genetics) — mostly for computational biologists, not founders building a company. The genuinely founder-relevant slice is flagged below; start there.
Start here — by company type
The narrow, cross-cutting slice that actually helps a company get built and funded, by company type.
Every MedTech company
- Clinical trial protocol drafting —
clinical-trial-protocol(Anthropic life-sciences & healthcare; OpenClaw-Medical) - Regulatory submission drafting (FDA / EMA / ICH) — OpenClaw-Medical
- Clinical / medical report writing — CSR per ICH-E3, CARE case reports — OpenClaw-Medical
- Literature search & evidence synthesis — DeepMind science-skills; K-Dense; OpenAI life-science-research
- Scientific writing & biostatistics — SciAgent-Skills; K-Dense
- Device & drug regulatory intelligence — OpenFDA MCP (510(k), device classifications, adverse events, recalls)
- Clinical trial landscape — ClinicalTrials.gov MCP / BioMCP
- Quality system & SaMD compliance — ISO 13485 Certification (K-Dense) is the one substantial QMS skill; 21 CFR 820 / ISO 14971 / IEC 62304 tools remain early-stage (see Regulatory, QMS & SaMD compliance below)
Digital health / SaMD adds
- FHIR development — Anthropic
fhir-developer; TopologyHealth ClaudeFHIRSkill - Prior authorisation & coverage (US market access) — Anthropic
prior-auth-review, CMS coverage - FHIR + LOINC MCP — for interoperability
Diagnostics adds
- Variant interpretation / federated variant query — ClawBio; DeepMind science-skills; BioMCP
- Precision-oncology & rare-disease tooling — ToolUniverse
- MyVariant / gene–disease–drug MCPs
Skills catalog
Official first-party skills
First-party repos — the highest-credibility sources.
Founder-relevant community skills
Most community life-science libraries are bench-research tooling. The founder-relevant content concentrates in two repos — K-Dense and OpenClaw-Medical — with ClawBio and ToolUniverse adding a diagnostics-only layer. Listed below are the specific named skills worth pulling, not the repos. Licence by source: K-Dense = verify · OpenClaw-Medical = mixed / inherited (link-only, never re-host) · ClawBio = verify · ToolUniverse = verify.
Excluded — bench-research, nothing founder-facing: swaruplab/operon (180+ protocols), GPTomics/bioSkills, HKU-BAL/Clair-skills — RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, WGS/WES, spatial, GWAS, variant calling. Relevant only to a diagnostics company running NGS analysis in-house, and even then as R&D tooling, not company-building. jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills (197, CC-BY-4.0) is mostly the same bench-tool wrappers; its only founder-relevant skills (biostatistics, scientific writing) are covered better by K-Dense. Licences for K-Dense / ClawBio / ToolUniverse still need confirming before any reuse.
Regulatory, QMS & SaMD compliance
The one reasonably substantial QMS skill is K-Dense’s ISO 13485 Certification (listed above) — gap analysis, templates for the 31 required procedures, QSR→QMSR transition, and EU MDR harmonisation. Beyond that, this layer is thin: a cluster of early-stage, mostly single-author, near-zero-adoption tools under the GitHub `medical-device` topic. Worth tracking, but treat as unvetted: low adoption, "human review required," quality not established. Note: since the FDA’s QMSR incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference from 2 February 2026, a 21 CFR 820 tool effectively covers the US ISO 13485 angle.
Reality check: this is the layer device founders most need and the layer that is least mature publicly. These are worth listing so founders know they exist, but none is a substitute for qualified regulatory-affairs work.
Clinical & commercial single-purpose
MedTech-fit warning: general-startup financial/pitch skills bake in SaaS assumptions (MRR/ARR, Rule of 40, the standard pitch arc) that mislead in MedTech’s milestone-driven, capital-intensive economics. Treat as scaffolding only.
Standards & methodology
MCP servers
The live data connections. Several founder-critical taps (device 510(k) data, clinical trials, literature) exist only as MCP, not as skills.
Regulatory & FDA
Clinical trials & evidence
Literature & paper search
Dedicated paper-search servers. medRxiv & bioRxiv servers are listed across the curated indexes below, and several aggregators above already bundle PubMed.
Multi-API aggregators
Genomics / variant (diagnostics)
Official Anthropic connectors (adjacent — not open source, but worth knowing). PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · Medidata (trial feasibility / site performance) · BioRender · Synapse · Wiley Scholar Gateway · CMS Coverage Database · ICD-10 · NPI Registry · 10x Genomics · ChEMBL · Open Targets · ToolUniverse. Available through Claude for Healthcare / Life Sciences.
Curated indexes & awesome lists
Re-scan these to track the ecosystem.
Licensing at a glance
These notes matter if you ever copy a skill into your own project:
"Verify" entries above have no licence confirmed yet — read the upstream LICENSE before any reuse.
Does curation help?
Independent benchmarks measuring whether curated skills improve agent performance:
- SkillsBench — Across 7,308 trajectories, curated skills lifted average task pass rate by +16.2 points, and +51.9 points for healthcare specifically; self-generated skills gave no average benefit, and focused 2–3 module skills beat comprehensive documentation. repo →
- BixBench — Real-world computational-biology agent tasks; the benchmark SciAgent-Skills tops at 92%. repo →
- BioAgent Bench, CompBioBench (Genentech), LAB-Bench, BiomniBench, BioMed-AQA — Further bioinformatics agent evaluations.
Using these safely
Data integrity
These are drafting and analysis aids, not sources of truth. Anything that emits a statistic, market figure, or citation must be traced to a named primary source before it enters a deck, submission, or board paper.
Skills run code
A skill can execute arbitrary code in the agent’s environment. Review the SKILL.md and any scripts before installing — especially from community repos.
Regulatory & clinical limits
Regulatory submissions, QMS documents, and clinical protocols generated here need qualified regulatory-affairs and clinical review before use. These tools do not replace that, and are not medical advice.
MedTech fit
Most libraries here are academic bench-research; the founder-relevant slice is in “Start here” above. SaaS-shaped financial/pitch skills do not fit MedTech economics.